When support exists on paper but not in practice

In one recent case, a young person with an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) spent a long period waiting for support that had already been recognised as necessary. Therapy recommendations were agreed. Equipment was identified. Learning arrangements outside school had been discussed. Professional evidence had been shared. An Ombudsman investigation had even upheld concerns about provision.

But much of what had been agreed never fully arrived. Over time, the plan changed, and parts of the support that had once been included quietly disappeared. Key health needs were not updated. Essential equipment for learning at home was still missing months later. Tutors continued working, but their reports and contributions remained unpaid. Emails asking for clarification often went unanswered.

For the family, this was not a single setback. It became a long stretch of uncertainty.

During this period, the young person’s education depended on Education Otherwise Than At School (EOTAS)arrangements. Yet even the status of those arrangements was unclear. Decisions appeared to shift without explanation, leaving the family unsure what support had actually been agreed.

At the same time, the child’s parent was undergoing serious medical treatment. Like many parents in similar situations, they continued advocating for their child while managing their own health and trying to keep everyday life stable at home. The young person’s wellbeing depended heavily on remaining within that family environment, which made the absence of reliable support feel increasingly urgent.

Despite repeated requests, professional evidence and formal escalation routes, including an upheld Ombudsman finding, the provision still had not been fully secured. For this family, the challenge was not identifying what support was needed. It was getting the support that had already been recognised to happen in practice.

Why this story matters

This case is not unusual because of one dramatic event. It matters because it shows how difficulties can emerge when:

• provision is agreed but not delivered

• plans are amended without full implementation

• communication slows or stops

• escalation routes exist but do not resolve issues quickly enough

• family circumstances change while support remains delayed

SEND systems are designed to protect children through coordination between education, health and care. When one part slows down, families often carry the impact.

What families can take from this

Families are often told they must “wait for process”.

This case shows:

• professional evidence matters

• Ombudsman findings matter

• written escalation matters

• keeping timelines matters

But it also highlights something equally important. If provision exists in an EHCP, it should not depend on persistence alone to be delivered. Support should not rely on families having the capacity to keep pushing while managing health, employment or caring responsibilities.

What schools and settings can take from this

Schools are frequently placed in the position of supporting pupils while external provision is delayed.

This story highlights the importance of:

• recording unmet provision clearly

• contributing evidence to annual reviews

• flagging safeguarding concerns early when provision gaps affect wellbeing

• supporting Preparation for Adulthood planning even when wider systems are slow

Schools cannot replace statutory services, but their documentation often becomes critical evidence when escalation is needed.

What professionals can take from this

Therapists, SENCOs and support professionals play a central role in maintaining continuity when systems stall.

Key learning points include:

• ensuring recommendations are reflected accurately in EHCP updates

• checking provision removal is evidence-based

• supporting families to understand escalation routes

• contributing written reports even when delivery arrangements are unclear

Professional voice is often what keeps plans aligned with real need.

What local authorities and services can take from this

Cases like this illustrate how delays can compound risk even when systems are working within pressure.

Particular areas highlighted here include:

• clarity around EOTAS decisions

• maintaining therapy provision through plan transitions

• responding to unpaid commissioned provision

• ensuring Preparation for Adulthood planning begins on time

• maintaining communication when family circumstances change

Most importantly, when provision already recognised as necessary is delayed, families experience uncertainty rather than support. Timely coordination is often the difference between stability and escalation.

Why we include stories like this in the newsletter

Real experiences help show how policy decisions and administrative processes affect children in practice.

Across the SEND landscape, progress depends not only on what is written into plans — but on how reliably those plans are delivered.

Each edition will continue sharing anonymised examples like this to support:

• transparency

• shared understanding

• and better collaboration across the system

because improving SEND support is never the responsibility of one group alone.

Subscribe